Welcome to The Territory  

The Porch

Reply To Message  |  Edit Message  |  Return to Index  |  Search Admin
Kenny 
SubjectNo, the classes are based on the qualifying criteria.
Posted on12-04-2006 13:02
From[IP Logged]

The rankings in the polls only determine seeding within the classes.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Class 1 would consist of undefeated teams that have met a level of scheduling as decided prior to the season that would put them in the upper 50% of all college football teams.

Class 2 would consist of undefeated teams whose strength of schedules put them in the lower 50% of all college football teams. This class would also consist of all one loss teams whose loss came to a team ranked higher than any opponent faced by the undefeated teams as one criteria by which a one-loss team could enter the post-season. That way a team that loses to a tough opponent will not be ousted by any team that has played nobody all year. The only other way a one-loss team should enter the playoff format would be to have faced an overall schedule a certain percent higher than any of the Class 2 undefeateds, with that percentage amount agreed upon by all of college football in advance of the season. Personally, I would start this percentage as only allowing those one-loss teams in the upper 10% of college football in strength of schedule and adjust from there after giving it 2-3 years to see how fair that works out.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

So basically, one loss and you are in Class Two. Undefeateds that schedule patsies drop to Class Two as a scheduling penalty. Class Two teams get the much tougher road to travel in every bracket I set up.

Where this criteria failed is in providing a penalty for one loss qualifiers that schedule patsies. I'd agree with adding that you can still qualify if you lose to a better team than the worst scheduled undefeated team has played BUT you must have an overall schedule in the upper 50% of the game to get that exception. That way teams can't schedule all patsies and one tough game and get in by virtue of that tough game being to a higher rated team than a patsy scheduling undefeated team plays to get in.

Seeing how the system works in all the different real world scenarios allows for modifications to improve it. It took seeing Wisconsin getting in with this real world scenario to see that a strength of schedule penalty for one loss Class Two qualifiers would be a good addition.

In the scenario of a team like Boise State going undefeated, it opens things up to where most every one loss team from the major conference would qualify, or in this case every one loss team qualifies. Setting a strength of schedule modifier for cases like this is helpful IMO and strengthens the desired heavy penalty for losing a game in the regular season that I want to maintain.


 Messages In This Thread
 Kenny's 2006 playoff.
Kenny 12-03-2006 02:02
 You left out Notre Dame. I'll never forgive you*
FirstNole 12-03-2006 02:14
 Sorry, but Notre Dame doesn't...
Kenny 12-03-2006 02:22
 *
FirstNole 12-03-2006 02:30
 BSU recruits good players, but...
znole 12-03-2006 03:32
 As for # 1), see Urban Meyer...
The Chieftain 12-03-2006 09:08
 can you post your proposed playoff format?*
fsu89 12-03-2006 07:34
 Let's see if this works.
Kenny 12-03-2006 10:34
 Hey Nole '91...you're in sports marketing...
Kenny 12-03-2006 10:50
 Additional games...
wncnole 12-03-2006 12:11
 That's why it might be best...
Kenny 12-03-2006 13:18
 Shorten the season by 2 games
Big Chunk 12-04-2006 12:00
 Seriously, Kenny, Best. Idea. Ever.
fsUTampa 12-03-2006 12:01
 I'd have no idea how to do it.
Kenny 12-03-2006 13:32
 I like it too, by the way...
seanman 12-04-2006 13:02
 The playoff games would be played...
Kenny 12-04-2006 13:23
 I like your system...
FirstNole 12-03-2006 22:19
 Simple solution to that...
Kenny 12-03-2006 22:32
 Cool!! Thanks for putting this back up......
BigJerNole 12-03-2006 22:30
 You gonna send it to me? *
JD 12-04-2006 08:38
 No need, it worked in the post.
Kenny 12-04-2006 08:43
 Wasn't the end of the post truncated?
JD 12-04-2006 12:03
 Oh yeah, I didn't notice that...
Kenny 12-04-2006 12:22
 Check the test forum...
JD 12-04-2006 12:28
 a question and a comment
CCnole 12-03-2006 17:42
 Seeds...
Kenny 12-03-2006 19:45
 BTTT, can't let this get lost*
fsUTampa 12-03-2006 21:55
 A comment and a question regarding Boise State
FirstNole 12-03-2006 22:11
 Peterson was his OC at Boise*
fsUTampa 12-03-2006 22:14
 It is my opinion...
Kenny 12-03-2006 22:27
 Some interesting stats for you:
FirstNole 12-03-2006 22:48
 Dude, you are comparing...
Kenny 12-03-2006 23:03
 Sorry, any playoff has to involve conference champs, IMO
Big Chunk 12-04-2006 08:31
 That's NFL Jr IMO.
Kenny 12-04-2006 08:39
 I understand your point, but...
The Chieftain 12-04-2006 09:37
 It's not just the idea of rematches.
Kenny 12-04-2006 11:51
 Wisconsin?*
duke nole 12-04-2006 12:03
 Unfortunately yes.
Kenny 12-04-2006 12:28
 Too much benefit...
UFNY 12-04-2006 12:31
 Those that schedule cupcakes...
Kenny 12-04-2006 12:48
 It looked to me...
UFNY 12-04-2006 12:52
 No, the classes are based on the qualifying criteria.
Kenny 12-04-2006 13:02
 If Div II and III can do it, well. . .*
JustHank 12-04-2006 16:10
 I'd hate that.
Kenny 12-04-2006 17:02

Reply To Message  |  Edit Message  |  Return to Index  |  Search Admin

Forum FAQ | Terms of Service | Donate | E-mail the webmaster

c. The Territory, 1995-2006. All rights reserved.